Home prices fall in October, Case-Shiller report says

December 27, 2011 |  8:11 am

Home prices in the nation’s largest cities fell in October for the second straight month, continuing to dash hopes that the sluggish housing market is headed for an upturn.

The Standard & Poor's/Case-Shiller index, a measure closely followed by economists, showed price drops in 19 of 20 cities since September. Overall, prices slipped 1.2% month-over-month and fell 3.4% compared with October 2010.

The decline is typical of the season, when home buyers back off after the busy summer period. But coming off of five straight months of increases, the retreating prices in the fall suggest that weakness in the market may stretch into 2012.

Atlanta was on particularly shaky ground, according to the index. Prices there declined 5% in October after falling 5.9% in September and were down 11.7% over the last 12 months. Atlanta, along with Cleveland, Detroit and Las Vegas, had average prices that were lower than they were in January 2000.

In Los Angeles prices were down 1.5% in October after sliding 0.8% the month before. Year over year, L.A. prices are down 4.9%.

The Case-Shiller data cast a pall on recent, more promising market feedback. Last week, the Commerce Department said construction of new homes and apartments was up 9.3% last month from October and up 20.1% compared wikth November 2010.

Sales in California were up 4% last month compared with the same period a year earlier, though they fell 4.2% from October, according to real estate research firm DataQuick. The median home price in the state was $244,000, down 4.3% from a year earlier but up 1.7% from October, the report found.

original link: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/money_co/2011/12/home-prices-fall-in-october-says-case-shiller-report.html 

Good News on Rent Restrictions for Second Dwelling Units on Property in Carlsbad

Second unit rent restrictions lifted for homeowners

CARLSBAD — A recent unanimous City Council vote made an important change for homeowners who have a second dwelling unit on their property. Rent restrictions have been lifted and homeowners can now charge the market value of their unit.

Before the vote, homeowners who had a second dwelling unit fell under the same category as developers who built multiple residential units and had to comply with the city’s Housing Element by renting to lower income groups.

But that’s all changed.

According to Corey Funk, associate planner for the city of Carlsbad, second dwelling units, or SDUs, are now split into two categories: inclusionary and noninclusionary.

Funk presented the proposal to City Council and it approved the revisions to the city’s Zoning Ordinance and Local Coastal Program Amendments for SDU rent regulations.

The inclusionary SDU was not amended. It will still go into effect when a developer builds multiple residential dwelling units and must provide 15 percent of the units as affordable housing.

“Developers doing a larger scale project must comply with the inclusionary housing ordinance, so we created the ‘inclusionary’ term to build that type of ordinance,” Funk said.

For a homeowner, a noninclusionary SDU label was issued distinguishing the difference between the reasons why a homeowner builds this type of dwelling unit versus a developer.

And those goals are quite different.

A noninclusionary SDU, Funk said, has a kitchen and bathroom and can serve as multiple functions. The unit can be used as a guest house, a mother-in-law quarter, or an office.

The noninclusionary SDU used to be restricted to at least low-income housing. Low income, Funk said, is defined by 50 to 80 percent of the area median income.

Funk said this proposal was brought to City Council because of a previous project that was presented to the Planning Commission a couple of years ago.

The topic of a SDU on a single-family residential property raised some awareness.

The Planning Commission felt that putting rent restrictions on homeowners was a burden.

City Council agreed.

City Council members felt that it was time to give homeowners the freedom to rent out their SDU at a fair market rate. Above all, staff said the noninclusionary SDU label was still consistent with the Housing Element requirements.

“The Housing Element counts the inventory of affordable housing opportunities and depends on SDUs to meet those goals,” Funk said. “When the noninclusionary SDUs were rent restricted we were counting them toward the low-income category for the housing element, but we also have to plan for the moderate income.”

Income categories include very low income, low income, moderate and above moderate. The calculations are similar to those used at U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

With homeowners now renting their units at a reasonable market rate, staff expects these units to be at affordable to moderate income levels, which will fall under the Housing Element guidelines.

Recent calculations show that the city of Carlsbad has a total of 215 SDUs. A total of 39 noninclusionary SDUs are part of this number.

“The noninclusionary SDUs are a small percentage,” Funk said.

Original Link http://thecoastnews.com/2011/12/second-unit-rent-restrictions-lifted-for-homeowners/

 

Why Home Prices Are (and Aren’t) Stabilizing - WSJ

Why Home Prices Are (and Aren’t) Stabilizing

Getty Images

Home prices are falling again, but some analysts see a silver lining because the prices of homes that aren’t selling out of foreclosure have been holding steady.

CoreLogic reported that home prices in October declined by 1.3% from September and by 3.9% from one year ago. A separate index released Monday by LPS Applied Analytics showed that home prices in September had dropped by 1.2% from August.

“Many housing statistics are basically moving sideways,” said Mark Fleming, chief economist at CoreLogic.

Still, the CoreLogic index shows an important emerging trend where home prices are stabilizing after excluding distressed sales.

What’s the difference between distressed sales and non-distressed sales?

Unlike traditional owners, banks are often faster to cut prices in order to unload properties quickly—or what are called “distressed” sales. The upshot is that, the more homes being sold by lenders in any given month the faster prices tend to fall.

This was clear throughout the initial years of the housing bust. Prices declined most sharply in 2008 as banks dumped foreclosed properties at fire-sale prices. Owner-occupants are less likely to list their homes for sale in the winter months, too, which means that each winter there are also drops in prices because distressed sales account for a growing share of sales.

Are prices of distressed homes falling at the same rate as non-distressed homes?

That’s been the case up until recently. While total home prices were down by 3.9% from one year ago, prices were down by just 0.5% from one year ago when excluding distressed sales. In September, total prices were down by 3.8% from one year ago, but non-distressed prices were down by 2.1%.

This shows that while price declines are resuming, they are not yet falling from one-year ago for non-distressed homes. In fact, during the first nine months of 2011, prices of non-distressed homes remained relatively stable, with year-over-year declines between 2% and 3%.

Analysts at Barclays Capital called this “the most important trend in the housing industry right now,” in a report published on Monday.

Why would any stabilization of non-distressed prices matter?

If it’s true that prices of non-distressed homes are stabilizing, even as distressed homes continue to fall in price, it would mean that a distressed home is “increasingly being seen as a poor substitute for a non-distressed home,” writes Stephen Kim, the Barclays housing analyst. He says it’s possible that the “bifurcation between distressed and non-distressed homes will only widen with the passage of time.”

Won’t the overhang of foreclosures put pressure on non-distressed prices anyway?

That’s all too possible. There are more than two million loans in some stage of foreclosure, and it may be too early to argue that those won’t in some way impact the sales prices of non-distressed homes. For one, homes that sell out of foreclosure at significantly lower prices could be used by appraisers as “comparable” sales that may make banks less willing to lend at an agreed sales price for a non-distressed home.

In certain markets where many homes are selling out of foreclosure, it’s hard to simply set aside distressed homes. “You can’t deny the fact that if half of homes that sold in San Diego in a given year were distressed, that is the trend,” said Kyle Lundstedt, managing director at LPS.

What could happen if this trend holds up, with distressed prices falling and non-distressed prices staying flat?

It could stabilize something else: home-buyer confidence. “There is nothing that strikes fear in a homeowner’s heart than to hear that his home value has declined,” writes Mr. Kim of Barclays. “But if it was home price trends that got us into this funk, it stands to reason that a recovery in sentiment will be similarly ushered in once price declines have abated—which is precisely what the CoreLogic price data shows us.”

Original Link: http://blogs.wsj.com/developments/2011/12/06/why-home-prices-are-and-arent-stabilizing/

Don't be scammed on buying homes

Carlsbad Investor Scammed out of $250,000

The investor was a victim of two Oceanside men who were both sentenced to prison today.