Should you Rent or Buy?
A few minutes ago I sent this Rent vs. Buy presentation to a client who is relocating to North San Diego County. I think that this is a presentation that bears consideration. I certainly welcome different points of view, so please tear this thing apart. Remember, I already said that “Cash Flow” in not a factor in this presentation.
A few weeks ago I was holding an open house at which I met a couple of Physicians. They were coming to this area and were going to be here for only three years. When I asked why they were not going to just rent their reply really made me think. The said that they could rent for about $3000/month or buy a similar home for about $500,000.00. In the three years that they were going to be in the area they figured that they would pay out $108,000.00 in rent. The way they looked at is was that if they bought for $500,000.00 they would put $100,000.00 down and have a monthly payment of around $2600.00. At the end of the three year period they would sell and probably get most of their initial purchase price back. (We have to remember that CASH flow is not a factor in their argument).
The formula that they used for the return of their initial purchase price went something like this. If they were able to sell for the same price that they paid, then after paying all of the costs to sell they would wind up with about $462,500.00. They used 7.5% as an estimate of what their costs to sell would be. Then if they applied the savings in income tax, things like the interest deduction, property tax deduction, depreciation of the portion of the home used for business, etc. Their cost of owner ship would be even less. When I presented the argument that interest is a tax deduction vs. tax credit and that their tax savings would be their effective tax rate as it applies to their interest expense their response was that if they pay 4.0% interest their total expense would be around $42,000.00 over the three years, maybe less. Their effective tax rate is 35% so they save $14,700.00 on Federal Income Tax plus what they save on their state taxes. The same theory would apply to the Property Tax expense.
Anyhow to make a long story short, these folks figured that if they sell the home for exactly what they paid ($500,000.00) they would loose $37,500.00 in sales costs, $27,300.00 in interest after the federal tax formula is applies, and $10,725 in property tax (again after application of the federal tax formula). There for they feel that after adding up all of the after tax expenses they would spend about $75,525 as a true cost of ownership versus $108,000 actual cost of renting. They also figured that if the prices were to drop an additional 5% during the time that they own the home they would loose an additional $25,000.00 and still they would break even.